The first instance verdict only identified false registered capital, illegal disclosure, non-disclosure of important information and misappropriation of funds and the establishment of the three counts. The judge in that decision, part of the charge of Chan gave a lighter sentence. Which the charge of false registration GHD Pink Orchid capital for intangible assets to total assets 75% a re - determine. GHD Companies Act provisions limit the proportion of 20%; the current ratio is 70%,http://uk.ghdstraightenerscheapx.com/ compliance with the existing laws to give the sentencing.
The judgment also believes that Chen as a Shunned Green cool shareholder, voluntarily 240 million yuan as registered capital of 900 million yuan worth of intangible assets, intangible assets balance of $ 660 million transferred to the capital reserve for ghd outlet, and not from GHD the actual capitalization of the company pulled out, which is also a factor the court to give a lighter sentence. In addition, in accordance with the existing criminal law ", the original false GHD accounting and financial reporting crime to change for the illegal disclosure, non-disclosure of important information on the crime.
Chen et al in the misappropriation of funds, misappropriation of funds, the number and total, the court identified only two of them set up that are misappropriated ghd iv styler, misappropriation of 40 million yuan in Jiangi Kellen for registration GHD and the diversion of YangShuo Yawing bus 63 million yuan. For the misappropriation of the other five funds, the court is unclear, the facts, citing insufficient evidence, shall not be recognized. Related crimes, judgments, Chen, Jiang Bao Jun two do not exist in the behavior of illegal appropriation of the unit of property.
http://uk.ghdstraightenerscheapx.com/
没有评论:
发表评论